Unit Testing
The Bento service offers a command bento test
for running unit tests on sections of a configuration file. This makes it easy to protect your config files from regressions over time.
Contents
Writing a Test
Let's imagine we have a configuration file foo.yaml
containing some processors:
input:
kafka:
addresses: [ TODO ]
topics: [ foo, bar ]
consumer_group: foogroup
pipeline:
processors:
- mapping: '"%vend".format(content().uppercase().string())'
output:
aws_s3:
bucket: TODO
path: '${! metadata("kafka_topic") }/${! json("message.id") }.json'
One way to write our unit tests for this config is to accompany it with a file of the same name and extension but suffixed with _bento_test
, which in this case would be foo_bento_test.yaml
.
tests:
- name: example test
target_processors: '/pipeline/processors'
environment: {}
input_batch:
- content: 'example content'
metadata:
example_key: example metadata value
output_batches:
-
- content_equals: EXAMPLE CONTENTend
metadata_equals:
example_key: example metadata value
Under tests
we have a list of any number of unit tests to execute for the config file. Each test is run in complete isolation, including any resources defined by the config file. Tests should be allocated a unique name
that identifies the feature being tested.
The field target_processors
is either the label of a processor to test, or a JSON Pointer that identifies the position of a processor, or list of processors, within the file which should be executed by the test. For example a value of foo
would target a processor with the label foo
, and a value of /input/processors
would target all processors within the input section of the config.
The field environment
allows you to define an object of key/value pairs that set environment variables to be evaluated during the parsing of the target config file. These are unique to each test, allowing you to test different environment variable interpolation combinations.
The field input_batch
lists one or more messages to be fed into the targeted processors as a batch. Each message of the batch may have its raw content defined as well as metadata key/value pairs.
For the common case where the messages are in JSON format, you can use json_content
instead of content
to specify the message structurally rather than verbatim.
The field output_batches
lists any number of batches of messages which are expected to result from the target processors. Each batch lists any number of messages, each one defining conditions
to describe the expected contents of the message.
If the number of batches defined does not match the resulting number of batches the test will fail. If the number of messages defined in each batch does not match the number in the resulting batches the test will fail. If any condition of a message fails then the test fails.
Inline Tests
Sometimes it's more convenient to define your tests within the config being tested. This is fine, simply add the tests
field to the end of the config being tested.
Bloblang Tests
Sometimes when working with large Bloblang mappings it's preferred to have the full mapping in a separate file to your Bento configuration. In this case it's possible to write unit tests that target and execute the mapping directly with the field target_mapping
, which when specified is interpreted as either an absolute path or a path relative to the test definition file that points to a file containing only a Bloblang mapping.
For example, if we were to have a file cities.blobl
containing a mapping:
root.Cities = this.locations.
filter(loc -> loc.state == "WA").
map_each(loc -> loc.name).
sort().join(", ")
We can accompany it with a test file cities_test.yaml
containing a regular test definition:
tests:
- name: test cities mapping
target_mapping: './cities.blobl'
environment: {}
input_batch:
- content: |
{
"locations": [
{"name": "Seattle", "state": "WA"},
{"name": "New York", "state": "NY"},
{"name": "Bellevue", "state": "WA"},
{"name": "Olympia", "state": "WA"}
]
}
output_batches:
-
- json_equals: {"Cities": "Bellevue, Olympia, Seattle"}
And execute this test the same way we execute other Bento tests (bento test ./dir/cities_test.yaml
, bento test ./dir/...
, etc).
Fragmented Tests
Sometimes the number of tests you need to define in order to cover a config file is so vast that it's necessary to split them across multiple test definition files. This is possible but Bento still requires a way to detect the configuration file being targeted by these fragmented test definition files. In order to do this we must prefix our target_processors
field with the path of the target relative to the definition file.
The syntax of target_processors
in this case is a full JSON Pointer that should look something like target.yaml#/pipeline/processors
. For example, if we saved our test definition above in an arbitrary location like ./tests/first.yaml
and wanted to target our original foo.yaml
config file, we could do that with the following:
tests:
- name: example test
target_processors: '../foo.yaml#/pipeline/processors'
environment: {}
input_batch:
- content: 'example content'
metadata:
example_key: example metadata value
output_batches:
-
- content_equals: EXAMPLE CONTENTend
metadata_equals:
example_key: example metadata value
Input Definitions
content
Sets the raw content of the message.
json_content
json_content:
foo: foo value
bar: [ element1, 10 ]
Sets the raw content of the message to a JSON document matching the structure of the value.
file_content
file_content: ./foo/bar.txt
Sets the raw content of the message by reading a file. The path of the file should be relative to the path of the test file.
metadata
A map of key/value pairs that sets the metadata values of the message.
Output Conditions
bloblang
bloblang: 'this.age > 10 && @foo.length() > 0'
Executes a Bloblang expression on a message, if the result is anything other than a boolean equalling true
the test fails.
content_equals
content_equals: example content
Checks the full raw contents of a message against a value.
content_matches
content_matches: "^foo [a-z]+ bar$"
Checks whether the full raw contents of a message matches a regular expression (re2).
metadata_equals
metadata_equals:
example_key: example metadata value
Checks a map of metadata keys to values against the metadata stored in the message. If there is a value mismatch between a key of the condition versus the message metadata this condition will fail.
file_equals
file_equals: ./foo/bar.txt
Checks that the contents of a message matches the contents of a file. The path of the file should be relative to the path of the test file.
file_json_equals
file_json_equals: ./foo/bar.json
Checks that both the message and the file contents are valid JSON documents, and that they are structurally equivalent. Will ignore formatting and ordering differences. The path of the file should be relative to the path of the test file.
json_equals
json_equals: { "key": "value" }
Checks that both the message and the condition are valid JSON documents, and that they are structurally equivalent. Will ignore formatting and ordering differences.
You can also structure the condition content as YAML and it will be converted to the equivalent JSON document for testing:
json_equals:
key: value
json_contains
json_contains: { "key": "value" }
Checks that both the message and the condition are valid JSON documents, and that the message is a superset of the condition.
Running Tests
Executing tests for a specific config can be done by pointing the subcommand test
at either the config to be tested or its test definition, e.g. bento test ./config.yaml
and bento test ./config_bento_test.yaml
are equivalent.
The test
subcommand also supports wildcard patterns e.g. bento test ./foo/*.yaml
will execute all tests within matching files. In order to walk a directory tree and execute all tests found you can use the shortcut ./...
, e.g. bento test ./...
will execute all tests found in the current directory, any child directories, and so on.
If you want to allow components to write logs at a provided level to stdout when running the tests, you can use
bento test --log <level>
. Please consult the logger docs for further details.
Mocking Processors
BETA: This feature is currently in a BETA phase, which means breaking changes could be made if a fundamental issue with the feature is found.
Sometimes you'll want to write tests for a series of processors, where one or more of them are networked (or otherwise stateful). Rather than creating and managing mocked services you can define mock versions of those processors in the test definition. For example, if we have a config with the following processors:
pipeline:
processors:
- mapping: 'root = "simon says: " + content()'
- label: get_foobar_api
http:
url: http://example.com/foobar
verb: GET
- mapping: 'root = content().uppercase()'
Rather than create a fake service for the http
processor to interact with we can define a mock in our test definition that replaces it with a mapping
processor. Mocks are configured as a map of labels that identify a processor to replace and the config to replace it with:
tests:
- name: mocks the http proc
target_processors: '/pipeline/processors'
mocks:
get_foobar_api:
mapping: 'root = content().string() + " this is some mock content"'
input_batch:
- content: "hello world"
output_batches:
- - content_equals: "SIMON SAYS: HELLO WORLD THIS IS SOME MOCK CONTENT"
With the above test definition the http
processor will be swapped out for mapping: 'root = content().string() + " this is some mock content"'
. For the purposes of mocking it is recommended that you use a mapping
processor that simply mutates the message in a way that you would expect the mocked processor to.
Note: It's not currently possible to mock components that are imported as separate resource files (using
--resource
/-r
). It is recommended that you mock these by maintaining separate definitions for test purposes (-r "./test/*.yaml"
).
More granular mocking
It is also possible to target specific fields within the test config by JSON pointers as an alternative to labels. The following test definition would create the same mock as the previous:
tests:
- name: mocks the http proc
target_processors: '/pipeline/processors'
mocks:
/pipeline/processors/1:
mapping: 'root = content().string() + " this is some mock content"'
input_batch:
- content: "hello world"
output_batches:
- - content_equals: "SIMON SAYS: HELLO WORLD THIS IS SOME MOCK CONTENT"
Fields
The schema of a template file is as follows:
tests
A list of one or more unit tests to execute.
Type: list of object
tests[].name
The name of the test, this should be unique and give a rough indication of what behaviour is being tested.
Type: string
tests[].environment
An optional map of environment variables to set for the duration of the test.
Type: map of string
tests[].target_processors
A JSON Pointer that identifies the specific processors which should be executed by the test. The target can either be a single processor or an array of processors. Alternatively a resource label can be used to identify a processor.
It is also possible to target processors in a separate file by prefixing the target with a path relative to the test file followed by a # symbol.
Type: string
Default: "/pipeline/processors"
# Examples
target_processors: foo_processor
target_processors: /pipeline/processors/0
target_processors: target.yaml#/pipeline/processors
target_processors: target.yaml#/pipeline/processors
tests[].target_mapping
A file path relative to the test definition path of a Bloblang file to execute as an alternative to testing processors with the target_processors
field. This allows you to define unit tests for Bloblang mappings directly.
Type: string
Default: ""
tests[].mocks
An optional map of processors to mock. Keys should contain either a label or a JSON pointer of a processor that should be mocked. Values should contain a processor definition, which will replace the mocked processor. Most of the time you'll want to use a mapping
processor here, and use it to create a result that emulates the target processor.
Type: map of unknown
# Examples
mocks:
get_foobar_api:
mapping: root = content().string() + " this is some mock content"
mocks:
/pipeline/processors/1:
mapping: root = content().string() + " this is some mock content"
tests[].input_batch
Define a batch of messages to feed into your test, specify either an input_batch
or a series of input_batches
.
Type: list of object
tests[].input_batch[].content
The raw content of the input message.
Type: string
tests[].input_batch[].json_content
Sets the raw content of the message to a JSON document matching the structure of the value.
Type: unknown
# Examples
json_content:
bar:
- element1
- 10
foo: foo value
tests[].input_batch[].file_content
Sets the raw content of the message by reading a file. The path of the file should be relative to the path of the test file.
Type: string
# Examples
file_content: ./foo/bar.txt
tests[].input_batch[].metadata
A map of metadata key/values to add to the input message.
Type: map of unknown
tests[].input_batches
Define a series of batches of messages to feed into your test, specify either an input_batch
or a series of input_batches
.
Type: object
tests[].input_batches[][].content
The raw content of the input message.
Type: string
tests[].input_batches[][].json_content
Sets the raw content of the message to a JSON document matching the structure of the value.
Type: unknown
# Examples
json_content:
bar:
- element1
- 10
foo: foo value
tests[].input_batches[][].file_content
Sets the raw content of the message by reading a file. The path of the file should be relative to the path of the test file.
Type: string
# Examples
file_content: ./foo/bar.txt
tests[].input_batches[][].metadata
A map of metadata key/values to add to the input message.
Type: map of unknown
tests[].output_batches
List of output batches.
Type: object
tests[].output_batches[][].bloblang
Executes a Bloblang mapping on the output message, if the result is anything other than a boolean equalling true
the test fails.
Type: string
# Examples
bloblang: this.age > 10 && @foo.length() > 0
tests[].output_batches[][].content_equals
Checks the full raw contents of a message against a value.
Type: string
tests[].output_batches[][].content_matches
Checks whether the full raw contents of a message matches a regular expression (re2).
Type: string
# Examples
content_matches: ^foo [a-z]+ bar$
tests[].output_batches[][].metadata_equals
Checks a map of metadata keys to values against the metadata stored in the message. If there is a value mismatch between a key of the condition versus the message metadata this condition will fail.
Type: map of unknown
# Examples
metadata_equals:
example_key: example metadata value
tests[].output_batches[][].file_equals
Checks that the contents of a message matches the contents of a file. The path of the file should be relative to the path of the test file.
Type: string
# Examples
file_equals: ./foo/bar.txt
tests[].output_batches[][].file_json_equals
Checks that both the message and the file contents are valid JSON documents, and that they are structurally equivalent. Will ignore formatting and ordering differences. The path of the file should be relative to the path of the test file.
Type: string
# Examples
file_json_equals: ./foo/bar.json
tests[].output_batches[][].json_equals
Checks that both the message and the condition are valid JSON documents, and that they are structurally equivalent. Will ignore formatting and ordering differences.
Type: unknown
# Examples
json_equals:
key: value
tests[].output_batches[][].json_contains
Checks that both the message and the condition are valid JSON documents, and that the message is a superset of the condition.
Type: unknown
# Examples
json_contains:
key: value
tests[].output_batches[][].file_json_contains
Checks that both the message and the file contents are valid JSON documents, and that the message is a superset of the condition. Will ignore formatting and ordering differences. The path of the file should be relative to the path of the test file.
Type: string
# Examples
file_json_contains: ./foo/bar.json